![]() Yes, it is free to get, but that's an indirect link you have to ask for the paper in order to get it. I'm not sure that this is a good thing to link. "Recent state of the art data recovery methodologies are discussed at Recovering Unrecoverable Data a whitepaper by ActionFront Data Recovery." Linking to external articles, sites and software Note that a previous version of this article was deleted as a copyvio - sannse (talk) 3 July 2005 11:31 (UTC) SudoGhost ™ 17:35, (UTC) Reply A previous version was copyvio It doesn't provide any additional information, and doesn't reliably verify any information given, the sole purpose of that website is to sell a service. If companies like Kroll Ontrack can be listed when there are companies with more to offer, why are they getting pulled instead? (Z) - Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.255.254 ( talk) 16:34, (UTC) Reply 173.8.255.254, your link violates WP:ELNO #5, which is why it is being removed. I think that having links or text pertaining to the pioneers of the data recovery industry is highly relevant in this article, even more so considering a lot of them have further information on their websites. Keep up the good work! -John 09:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC) However, as the editor(s), you have the last say and I respect that. The forum is relatively new, but has helped people already who were looking for independant advice or just want to research the subject. But I was linking to a resource that would be useful to many who would read this article rather than shamelessly promoting it. If there had been a link to a similar resource that was more notable then I wouldn't have bothered. FreelanceWizard 17:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Reply I can appreciate what you're saying. It's a small board with little notability, basically, and notability is one of the factors many Wikipedia editors use to decide what stays and what goes. I took a look at the forum you linked and, IMHO, it seems rather self-promoting to post a link to it in this article. So, that probably explains some of the zealousness in reverting. The consensus of those who keep an eye on this page seems to be that external links to things that aren't clear, unbiased advice aren't okay. This page tends to get a lot of spammers posting links to their sites here. I was wondering why linking to a forum discussing data recovery methods would be deemed wrong by an administrator whereas a barely related whitepaper on whether security services can read straight from a platter is ok? I thought external links to related resources that provided further reading for those interested was what WP was all about? Please don't say the great Wikipedia is going the same way as DMOZ? The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. ![]() Text and/or other creative content from Data recovery was copied or moved into Recovery software with this edit. This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. Computing Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing Template:WikiProject Computing Computing articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Une fois que l'analyse est terminée, il suffit de cliquer sur le bouton de restauration pour démarrer la récupération.This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. ![]() En effet, tout ce que l'utilisateur a besoin de faire, c'est de le lancer, puis de sélectionner le matériel à scanner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |